IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v78y2024i2p334-356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Yates, Conover, and Mantel statistics in 2 × 2 tables revisited (and extended)

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Martín Andrés
  • María Álvarez Hernández
  • Francisco Gayá Moreno

Abstract

Asymptotic inferences about the difference, ratio or odds‐ratio of two independent proportions are very common in diverse fields. This article defines for each parameter eight conditional inference methods. These methods depend on: (1) using a chi‐squared type statistic or a z type one; (2) using the classic Yates continuity correction or the less well‐known Conover one; and (3) whether the p‐value of the test is determined by doubling the one‐tailed p‐value or by the Mantel method (asymmetrical approach). In all cases, the conclusions are: (i) the methods based on the chi‐squared statistic should not be used, as they are too liberal; (ii) for those in favor of using the criterion of doubling the p‐value, the best method is using the z statistic with Conover continuity correction; and (iii) for those in favor of the asymmetrical approach, the best method is based on the z statistic with Conover continuity correction and the Mantel p‐value.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Martín Andrés & María Álvarez Hernández & Francisco Gayá Moreno, 2024. "The Yates, Conover, and Mantel statistics in 2 × 2 tables revisited (and extended)," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 78(2), pages 334-356, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:78:y:2024:i:2:p:334-356
    DOI: 10.1111/stan.12320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12320
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/stan.12320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:78:y:2024:i:2:p:334-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.