IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v76y2022i3p283-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction intervals for all of M future observations based on linear random effects models

Author

Listed:
  • Max Menssen
  • Frank Schaarschmidt

Abstract

In many pharmaceutical and biomedical applications such as assay validation, assessment of historical control data, or the detection of anti‐drug antibodies, the calculation and interpretation of prediction intervals (PI) is of interest. The present study provides two novel methods for the calculation of prediction intervals based on linear random effects models and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation. Unlike other REML‐based PI found in the literature, both intervals reflect the uncertainty related with the estimation of the prediction variance. The first PI is based on Satterthwaite approximation. For the other PI, a bootstrap calibration approach that we will call quantile‐calibration was used. Due to the calibration process this PI can be easily computed for more than one future observation and based on balanced and unbalanced data as well. In order to compare the coverage probabilities of the proposed PI with those of four intervals found in the literature, Monte Carlo simulations were run for two relatively complex random effects models and a broad range of parameter settings. The quantile‐calibrated PI was implemented in the statistical software R and is available in the predint package.

Suggested Citation

  • Max Menssen & Frank Schaarschmidt, 2022. "Prediction intervals for all of M future observations based on linear random effects models," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 76(3), pages 283-308, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:76:y:2022:i:3:p:283-308
    DOI: 10.1111/stan.12260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12260
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/stan.12260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:76:y:2022:i:3:p:283-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.