IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v58y2004i3p271-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the causal effect of a time‐varying treatment on time‐to‐event using structural nested failure time models

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Lok
  • Richard Gill
  • Aad Van Der Vaart
  • James Robins

Abstract

In this paper we review an approach to estimating the causal effect of a time‐varying treatment on time to some event of interest. This approach is designed for a situation where the treatment may have been repeatedly adapted to patient characteristics, which themselves may also be time‐dependent. In this situation the effect of the treatment cannot simply be estimated by conditioning on the patient characteristics, as these may themselves be indicators of the treatment effect. This so‐called time‐dependent confounding is typical in observational studies. We discuss a new class of failure time models, structural nested failure time models, which can be used to estimate the causal effect of a time‐varying treatment, and present methods for estimating and testing the parameters of these models.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Lok & Richard Gill & Aad Van Der Vaart & James Robins, 2004. "Estimating the causal effect of a time‐varying treatment on time‐to‐event using structural nested failure time models," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 58(3), pages 271-295, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:58:y:2004:i:3:p:271-295
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2004.00123.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2004.00123.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2004.00123.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Commenges & Anne Gégout‐Petit, 2009. "A general dynamical statistical model with causal interpretation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(3), pages 719-736, June.
    2. Rui Chen & Menggang Yu, 2021. "Tailored optimal posttreatment surveillance for cancer recurrence," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 942-955, September.
    3. Stephen Kastoryano & Bas van der Klaauw, 2022. "Dynamic evaluation of job search assistance," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 227-241, March.
    4. Kevin He & Yun Li & Panduranga S. Rao & Randall S. Sung & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2020. "Prognostic score matching methods for estimating the average effect of a non-reversible binary time-dependent treatment on the survival function," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 451-470, July.
    5. Markus Frölich & Martin Huber, 2014. "Treatment Evaluation With Multiple Outcome Periods Under Endogeneity and Attrition," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(508), pages 1697-1711, December.
    6. Judith J. Lok & Victor DeGruttola, 2012. "Impact of Time to Start Treatment Following Infection with Application to Initiating HAART in HIV-Positive Patients," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 745-754, September.
    7. Robin Henderson & Phil Ansell & Deyadeen Alshibani, 2010. "Regret-Regression for Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 1192-1201, December.
    8. Yujie Xu & Vivian Loftness & Edson Severnini, 2021. "Using Machine Learning to Predict Retrofit Effects for a Commercial Building Portfolio," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:58:y:2004:i:3:p:271-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.