IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v58y2004i1p111-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of randomized complete block design

Author

Listed:
  • Gwowen Shieh
  • Show‐Li Jan

Abstract

This paper examines the relative efficiency of randomized complete block design as compared with that of completely randomized design. The most widely used measure of relative efficiency considers only the error variances of the two designs, therefore it does not provide the complete information concerning the sensitivity of the experiment in the final results. We study three alternative criteria related to the sensitivity issue and design planning consideration. The proposed relative measures employ the p‐value, Scheffé confidence interval estimation and power of both designs. The distinct feature of this study is the focus on the estimated relative efficiency measures and their relation with the coefficient of partial determination between responses and block effects, given that treatment effects are present in the models. Furthermore, informative visual representations and numerical assessments of various aspects of their properties are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Gwowen Shieh & Show‐Li Jan, 2004. "The effectiveness of randomized complete block design," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 58(1), pages 111-124, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:58:y:2004:i:1:p:111-124
    DOI: 10.1046/j.0039-0402.2003.00109.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0039-0402.2003.00109.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1046/j.0039-0402.2003.00109.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:58:y:2004:i:1:p:111-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.