IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v36y2019i1p111-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systems Perspective for Conceptualizing Sustainability in Long‐lived Family Businesses. Research Proposals on Risk Taking and Innovativeness

Author

Listed:
  • Agostino Vollero
  • Alfonso Siano
  • Maddalena Della Volpe

Abstract

Sustainability has been interpreted in family business research as the outcome of typical organizational dynamics, such as a moderate aversion to risk and a lack of intent to innovate. Drawing on the systems theory, this study identifies the key drivers for a broader conceptualization of sustainability for family businesses, based on the interplay of three interacting systems. A multiple case study research design involving companies belonging to Les Henokiens (an association of bicentenary family businesses) has been conducted in this systemic conceptualization. Unlike the assumptions presented in other research, our proposals suggest that fluctuating levels of risk taking and propensity to innovate may be a management response that occurs when the equilibrium of these interacting systems is in danger. This study's contribution is that it validates the systems theory as the leading theoretical perspective in family business research, which may help overcome ‘management paradoxes’ resulting from the overlap of conflicting systems. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Agostino Vollero & Alfonso Siano & Maddalena Della Volpe, 2019. "A Systems Perspective for Conceptualizing Sustainability in Long‐lived Family Businesses. Research Proposals on Risk Taking and Innovativeness," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 111-127, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:36:y:2019:i:1:p:111-127
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2548
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristina Bettinelli & Marco Mismetti & Alfredo De Massis & Barbara Del Bosco, 2022. "A Review of Conflict and Cohesion in Social Relationships in Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 539-577, May.
    2. Orlando Llanos-Contreras & Jose Arias & Carlos Maquieira, 2021. "Risk taking behavior in Chilean listed family firms: a socioemotional wealth approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 165-184, March.
    3. Anne Jensen & Helle Ørsted Nielsen & Duncan Russel, 2020. "Climate Policy in a Fragmented World—Transformative Governance Interactions at Multiple Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-8, November.
    4. Giorgia Nigri & Riccardo Di Stefano, 2021. "Family Business in Italy: a Humanistic Transition of Assets and Values from One Generation to the Next," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 57-76, April.
    5. Małgorzata Okręglicka & Prabhat Mittal & Valentinas Navickas, 2023. "Exploring the Mechanisms Linking Perceived Organizational Support, Autonomy, Risk Taking, Competitive Aggressiveness and Corporate Sustainability: The Mediating Role of Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Alba Rocio Gutierrez Garzon & Pete Bettinger & Jacek Siry & Bin Mei & Jesse Abrams, 2019. "The Terms Foresters and Planners in the United States Use to Infer Sustainability in Forest Management Plans: A Survey Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:36:y:2019:i:1:p:111-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.