IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v35y2018i5p548-563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Report and Reflection on an Application of Critical Systems Practice to Improve a Business Intelligence System's Business Requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Carin Venter
  • Roelien Goede

Abstract

Organizations require relevant and accurate information and systems for making strategic decisions. However, in practice, these business intelligence systems have a high failure rate, in part due to an overemphasis on technical implementation, and perhaps more importantly, the inability of prospective users to visualize the needs of the future system in the requirements phase. In this paper, critical systems practice is used to guide the selection of alternative requirements collection methodologies for the requirements phase, reviewing methodologies from the interpretive, critical and postmodern paradigms for their suitability for use in the described case study. In the resulting selection of critical systems heuristics for this intervention, this paper argues that although critical systems heuristics was developed in an era when the critical paradigm emerged, it can be applied from a postmodern perspective and that it may also be useful in guiding the creative process to identify requirements that improve business decision making that is sensitive to the local environment and enhance future decision making. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Carin Venter & Roelien Goede, 2018. "A Report and Reflection on an Application of Critical Systems Practice to Improve a Business Intelligence System's Business Requirements," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 548-563, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:35:y:2018:i:5:p:548-563
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2565
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:35:y:2018:i:5:p:548-563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.