IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v30y2013i5p596-606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Apithological Inquiry: Learnings from an Ecological Aesthetic

Author

Listed:
  • Will Varey

Abstract

This paper extends contributions from the philosophy of ecological systems theory to frame new learnings in the practice of apithological inquiry. These learning insights are combined in levels of logical categories of types to inform the generative structuring of the observations of complex systems. Sets of choices in composition, coherence, constrictions and contributions are outlined. Observational errors comprising forms of naïve realism, entity reification, gross simplification, values projection and normative assertions are contextualized. The alternatives of ontological humility, epistemological openness, methodological appropriateness, axiological reflexivity and metonymic responsibility are proposed. The learning choices outlined are reflective of the practice by which an apithological aesthetic informs the appreciation of complex systems. From this analysis, five observational protocols are derived as requirements for the praxis of apithological inquiry. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Will Varey, 2013. "Apithological Inquiry: Learnings from an Ecological Aesthetic," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 596-606, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:30:y:2013:i:5:p:596-606
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2211
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:30:y:2013:i:5:p:596-606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.