IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v30y2013i1p43-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science and its Discontents: Is There an End to Knowing?

Author

Listed:
  • Gennady Shkliarevsky

Abstract

Is there an end to our scientific quest? This question that continues to divide the scientific community between those who believe that the progress of science is infinite and those who think that we already understand how the universe works and no major discoveries are to be expected in the future. This article explores the philosophical worldview of modern science that has given rise to this question. It argues that an approach to knowledge that focuses on the process of construction of knowledge rather than its products offers a possibility of definitively answering this question and opening paths for a more rational approach in advancing and managing the scientific progress. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Gennady Shkliarevsky, 2013. "Science and its Discontents: Is There an End to Knowing?," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 43-55, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:30:y:2013:i:1:p:43-55
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2127
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gennady Shkliarevsky, 2016. "Rethinking Democracy: A Systems Perspective on the Global Unrest," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 452-470, May.
    2. Gennady Shkliarevsky, 2015. "Squaring the Circle: In Quest for Sustainability," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 629-645, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:30:y:2013:i:1:p:43-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.