IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v29y2012i5p470-483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systems Thinking: Common Ground or Untapped Territory?

Author

Listed:
  • Pamela Buckle Henning
  • Wan‐Ching Chen

Abstract

At international gatherings of systems scholars, the term ‘systems thinking’ elicits understanding nods and smiles. Such thinking, it would appear, is a way this largely academic community works ‘all together now’, thinking in a systemic way about our varied areas of inquiry. But how common is this understanding among us? Assessing the degree to which we work ‘all together now’ requires recognizing the different assumptions we make about what systems thinking means. So powerful is systems thinking's capacity to holistically address twenty‐first‐century problems that much has been written about it for laypeople. This article presents a content analysis of 14 popular books on systems thinking, revealing that ISSS members’ understanding nods and smiles belie a plurality of meanings assigned to systems thinking and claims about what it means to be a systems thinker. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamela Buckle Henning & Wan‐Ching Chen, 2012. "Systems Thinking: Common Ground or Untapped Territory?," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 470-483, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:29:y:2012:i:5:p:470-483
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2155
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sreekumar A. Menon & Marc Muchnick & Clifford Butler & Tony Pizur, 2021. "Complexity Theory: Insights from a Canadian ERP Project Implementation," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(6), pages 1-84, July.
    2. Yearworth, Mike & White, Leroy, 2014. "The non-codified use of problem structuring methods and the need for a generic constitutive definition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 932-945.
    3. Tavella, Elena & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2017. "Applying OR to problem situations within community organisations: A case in a Danish non-profit, member-driven food cooperative," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 726-742.
    4. Sreekumar A. Menon & Marc Muchnick & Clifford Butler & Tony Pizur, 2021. "Critical Challenges in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(7), pages 1-54, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:29:y:2012:i:5:p:470-483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.