IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v99y2018i5p1765-1775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Increasing Party Diversity May Lead to Worsening Reported Racial Attitudes

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher T. Stout
  • Keith Baker

Abstract

Objective To explore whether increases in diversity give partisans immunity from claims of racial prejudice. To assess when individuals are more likely to report racially progressive attitudes when their party is accused of racism and racial representation in the party varies. Method We implement a survey experiment where individuals are told their party harbors either racial or religious prejudice and then are asked to vote on a party primary election in which the race of the candidates varies. Results We find that white Republicans modify their racial attitudes in response to accusations of racism. However, this effect disappears when white Republicans are presented with evidence of racial/ethnic diversity in their party. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that racial/ethnic diversity in one's political party may delegitimize claims of racial bias and minimize these accusations' ability to alter racial attitudes.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher T. Stout & Keith Baker, 2018. "How Increasing Party Diversity May Lead to Worsening Reported Racial Attitudes," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1765-1775, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:5:p:1765-1775
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12533
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12533?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:5:p:1765-1775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.