IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v98y2017i5p1339-1351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Convenient Truth: University Employees as Heterogeneous and Inexpensive Experimental Samples

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitri Kelly
  • Logan Vidal
  • Barry C. Burden

Abstract

Objectives Building on work by Kam, Wilking, and Zechmeister, we argue that academic researchers ought to make greater use of campus employees for survey experiments. For applications where a representative sample is unattainable and student samples provide too little variation on key characteristics, staff members provide an inexpensive alternative that offers greater statistical leverage and the ability to detect conditional treatment effects Methods Using an e†mail survey experiment conducted on employees at a large public university, we explore how two modest incentives for participation affect the quantity and quality of responses. Results While overall differences among conditions are modest, a cash lottery generates somewhat higher response rates with little effect on sociodemographic skew or level of satisficing. The condition offering a charitable contribution fared worse on both counts. Conclusion University employees provide a convenient, heterogeneous, and inexpensive population for experimental studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitri Kelly & Logan Vidal & Barry C. Burden, 2017. "A Convenient Truth: University Employees as Heterogeneous and Inexpensive Experimental Samples," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1339-1351, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:98:y:2017:i:5:p:1339-1351
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12336
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12336?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:98:y:2017:i:5:p:1339-1351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.