IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v82y2001i1p184-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Conservative Sociopolitical Attitudes on Public Support for Drug Rehabilitation Spending

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey M. Timberlake
  • Kenneth A. Rasinski
  • Eric D. Lock

Abstract

Objective. In this article we investigate why traditionally conservative social groups show less support for spending on drug rehabilitation programs than for drug control spending in general. Methods. Using data from the 1984 through 1998 General Social Surveys, we first estimate logistic regressions of support for drug control spending across five sociopolitical cleavages. We then estimate effects of three types of sociopolitical attitudes on support for drug spending within traditionally conservative groups. Results. Resistance to rehabilitation spending among conservatives is related to their opposition to the welfare state, punitive attitudes toward criminals, and among whites, racial attitudes. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that citizens may withhold support for a social policy to the extent that it evokes negative associations with other salient sociopolitical issues or attitudes. We discuss the importance of these associations for understanding the relationships among political debate, public opinion, and policy outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey M. Timberlake & Kenneth A. Rasinski & Eric D. Lock, 2001. "Effects of Conservative Sociopolitical Attitudes on Public Support for Drug Rehabilitation Spending," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 82(1), pages 184-196, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:82:y:2001:i:1:p:184-196
    DOI: 10.1111/0038-4941.00016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/0038-4941.00016
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/0038-4941.00016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julie Camus & Astrid Lhermite & Maria Teresa Munoz Sastre & Paul Clay Sorum & Etienne Mullet, 2016. "Addictive Substances, Users’ Health, and the Government’s Perceived Responsibility: French People’s Perspective," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1011-1027, September.
    2. Wilson López López & Claudia Pineda Marín & Paul Sorum & Etienne Mullet, 2016. "Prohibition, Regulation or Free Market: A Mapping of Colombian People’s Perspectives Regarding National Drug Policies," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 126(2), pages 689-710, March.
    3. Julie Camus & Maria Sastre & Paul Sorum & Etienne Mullet, 2014. "French People’s Positions Regarding National Policies About Illicit Drugs: A Preliminary Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 1191-1204, September.
    4. George Wilson & Amie L. Nielsen, 2011. "“Color Coding†and Support for Social Policy Spending: Assessing the Parameters among Whites," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 634(1), pages 174-189, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:82:y:2001:i:1:p:184-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.