IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i2p359-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging the insights of depth: A staged strategy for building qualitative case studies of American state‐level policy

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua A. Basseches
  • Michael C. Campbell
  • Heather Schoenfeld

Abstract

Objective This article identifies and explains the need for qualitative case studies of U.S. state‐level public policy and politics before providing researchers with a practical roadmap for how to proceed. Methods We first review relevant research from political science and sociology to establish the need for qualitative policy‐focused state‐level case study research. We then lay out a three‐stage approach for case study research design and data collection. Results We find that qualitative case study research into state‐level politics and policy making is useful for developing original theories that move beyond those developed at the federal level, for distinguishing between states and state policies in ways that are not easily measurable, and for conducting research that attends to variation in the meaning of policy design within different state contexts. We further find that barriers to conducting such research can be reduced by following a three‐stage strategy that we elaborate. Conclusion State‐level policy making yields essential processes and outcomes that social scientists across disciplines want to understand. Relying exclusively on quantitative methods will result in incomplete knowledge acquisition. Qualitative case studies, while time‐consuming, are worthwhile and achievable. Researchers seeking to conduct this research can follow a three‐stage strategy to make the process more manageable.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua A. Basseches & Michael C. Campbell & Heather Schoenfeld, 2024. "Leveraging the insights of depth: A staged strategy for building qualitative case studies of American state‐level policy," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(2), pages 359-373, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:2:p:359-373
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13346
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:2:p:359-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.