IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i2p242-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the relationship between gender equality and citizen trust: Evidence from Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Yunsoo Lee
  • Mattias Ottervik

Abstract

Objectives Previous research has shown a relationship between social and economic equality and trust, but the relationship between gender equality and trust has received relatively little attention. This study addresses that lacuna and analyzes the relationship between gender equality and political trust as well as social trust. Methods Using the 2015 Latinobarómetro, we test the relationship between two types of gender equality, labor gender equality and overall gender equality, and two types of trust, political trust and social trust in a series of regressions. Results The results show that gender equality is positively associated with social and political trust. In particular, the magnitude of association of labor gender equality with social trust is greater than that of overall gender equality. Also, the magnitude of association of overall gender equality with political trust is greater than that of labor gender equality. Conclusions Our article contributes to the literature by demonstrating that overall gender equality and labor gender equality have varying association with trust depending on types of trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunsoo Lee & Mattias Ottervik, 2024. "Investigating the relationship between gender equality and citizen trust: Evidence from Latin America," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(2), pages 242-252, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:2:p:242-252
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13350
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:2:p:242-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.