IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i2p211-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More than the Second Amendment: Liberal gun owners, citizenship, and emancipatory democracy in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Hubbert
  • Hannah Eaton

Abstract

Objective This study seeks to understand how liberal gun owners configure the rights and responsibilities of ethical gun citizenship in the face of a dominant public narratives that rejects guns as markers of liberal belonging. Methods This study employs a qualitative, textual analysis approach to explore the narratives of liberal gun owners participating in online discussions of mass shootings and contentious political elections. Results The results show how liberal gun owners, in these online forums, advocated for an emancipatory democracy that largely prioritized the collective over the individual, demanded an accountable government, and was radical in its insistence on the importance of accessibility and meaningful participation, thus configuring social belonging and commensurability as central to formal citizenship. Conclusion The results suggest that how one formulates the values of citizenship is linked to how one practices the politics of democracy. Highlighting the greater range of possibilities for the alignment of guns and citizenship may thus offer some hope to the rancor of contemporary partisan politics as liberal gun owners seek to normalize a democracy that brings individual and collective identities and needs into its culture and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Hubbert & Hannah Eaton, 2024. "More than the Second Amendment: Liberal gun owners, citizenship, and emancipatory democracy in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(2), pages 211-225, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:2:p:211-225
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13352
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:2:p:211-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.