IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v102y2021i7p3073-3080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why black women activists stay in the room when they are not being heard

Author

Listed:
  • Karlia Nicole Brown

Abstract

Objective Despite the vital roles that black women play in black activist organizations, they are often overlooked and mistreated within such spaces. The purpose of this article is to examine why black women remain engaged in black activist spaces given this treatment. Methods I conducted in‐depth interviews with 25 black women engaged in activist organizations in the Chicagoland area. Results This study found that black women remain engaged in black activist spaces where they experienced mistreatment because (1) they believed that the black community's fight for freedom was worth their radical sacrifice, and (2) they felt both empowered by the legacy of black activist women of past movements and responsible for continuing that legacy in order to improve the lives and path to liberation of the black women that will come after them. Conclusion I suggest that the sacrifices of black women activists are ultimately motivated by an ethic of care that stems from a love for their community and themselves. While some do find the legacy of black women activists to be burdensome, many aim to continue the legacy of their predecessors by establishing a foundation onto which future generations can build a path to black liberation.

Suggested Citation

  • Karlia Nicole Brown, 2021. "Why black women activists stay in the room when they are not being heard," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3073-3080, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:7:p:3073-3080
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13092
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:7:p:3073-3080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.