IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v102y2021i6p2930-2941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Easy” and “hard” issues: Attitude extremity and a role of the need to evaluate

Author

Listed:
  • Heysung Lee

Abstract

Background This article addresses the topic of issue polarization among the mass public, focusing on the classic typology of “easy” and “hard” issues (Carmines and Stimson, 1980) and the influence of the individual‐level motivational variable, which is the need to evaluate. Objective Carmines and Stimson (1980) suggest that issues are characterized by their “hardness,” the degree of how much issues are easy to understand and make political evaluations. This article contends that the NTE would positively relate to attitude extremity of “hard” issues, which require extensive motivations for political judgment but would not necessarily be associated with attitude extremity of “easy” issues, which do not require such motivations. Methods In the analyses, four “easy” issues (abortion, same‐sex marriage, affirmative action, and gun control) and four “hard” issues (immigration, tax, health care, and climate change) were selected to compare the effects of the NTE on attitude extremity, based on previous literature. The data of 2016 American National Election Survey was used to test the hypotheses. Results The analyses using the data of the 2016 American National Election Survey supported the hypotheses by showing that the need to evaluate was related to increased attitude extremity on all “hard” issues, whereas need to evaluate was not associated with extremity on “easy” issues except the issue of affirmative action. Conclusion Need to evaluate is related to attitude extremity on “easy” and “hard” issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Heysung Lee, 2021. "“Easy” and “hard” issues: Attitude extremity and a role of the need to evaluate," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2930-2941, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:6:p:2930-2941
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13094
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13094?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Hawley, 2013. "Issue Voting and Immigration: Do Restrictionist Policies Cost Congressional Republicans Votes?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 94(5), pages 1185-1206, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:6:p:2930-2941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.