IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v102y2021i4p1966-1981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is it a four‐star movement? Policy transformation and the U.S. women's national soccer team's campaign for equal pay

Author

Listed:
  • Ashley English

Abstract

Objective In 2019, the U.S.Women's soccer team (USWNT) sold shirts claiming “It's not a moment, it is a four‐star movement,” positioning the team as leaders of a transformative movement for equal pay that would benefit all women. Were they? Method Drawing on the gender and public policy and agenda setting literatures, I use the players’ statements about the team's wage discrimination case, and members of Congress' (MCs) speeches to analyze whether the USWNT's case promoted transformative changes in the enforcement of American equal pay policies. Results The players and MCs failed to use the USWNT's case to promote a shared transformative call for changes in equal pay enforcement policies. Both the team and the MCs also prioritized the broad concerns of women and girls over the diversity of women's experiences with wage discrimination. Conclusion The players’ case and MCs' responses to it indicate that this case of policy‐focused athlete activism did not promote transformative enforcement changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashley English, 2021. "Is it a four‐star movement? Policy transformation and the U.S. women's national soccer team's campaign for equal pay," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1966-1981, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:4:p:1966-1981
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13026
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:4:p:1966-1981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.