IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v102y2021i4p1866-1881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Deep questions for a Saturday morning”: An investigation of the Australian and Canadian general public's definitions of gender

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Hall
  • Limin Jao
  • Cinzia Di Placido
  • Rebecca Manikis

Abstract

Objective Many studies exist about people's views of gender in a wide variety of fields. However, participants are not typically asked what they think gender means; rather, gender is presumed to have a taken‐as‐shared meaning. Methods As part of a larger study conducted in Australia and Canada about the general public's views of gender and mathematics, we investigated participants’ definitions of the term gender. We considered overall trends and trends by demographic group (country, gender, age, and education level). Results Most commonly, gender was defined as a person's feelings or self‐identification. Participants also frequently solely used the terms male and female or discussed biological features. However, response patterns varied widely by demographic group. Conclusion Due to these diverse and sometimes contradictory definitions, we argue that researchers cannot assume that participants have common understanding of the term gender. We conclude by providing suggestions for how gender‐focused research can be done in more transparent ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Hall & Limin Jao & Cinzia Di Placido & Rebecca Manikis, 2021. "“Deep questions for a Saturday morning”: An investigation of the Australian and Canadian general public's definitions of gender," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1866-1881, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:4:p:1866-1881
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13021
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:4:p:1866-1881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.