IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v102y2021i3p959-978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduction to the Special Issue on Reframing Confederate Monuments: Memory, Power, and Identity

Author

Listed:
  • Jocelyn J. Evans
  • William B. Lees

Abstract

Objective This article highlights the contours of the Confederate monument debate, frames the contributions to the special issue, and underscores important emergent themes from the collection as a whole. Method By way of introduction, we articulate and examine the issue of Confederate monument contestation in terms of three concurrent debates and then provide theoretical synthesis across the various scholarly contributions presented in this special issue. Results Several themes emerge. Memorials are rhetorical and evocative by design, articulating messages of memory, identity, and power. They are part of a broader living narrative giving cultural shape to the city and its inhabitants. Contesting them is part of a transitional justice process required of a society moving from racial oppression and marginalization toward racial equality and social justice. Conclusions The contemporary debate over Confederate monuments holds deep theoretical implications for scholars across the disciplines of the arts, social sciences, and humanities. Consequently, the academy is significantly positioned to speak to this debate through its various avenues of community engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Jocelyn J. Evans & William B. Lees, 2021. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Reframing Confederate Monuments: Memory, Power, and Identity," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(3), pages 959-978, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:3:p:959-978
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12960
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:3:p:959-978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.