IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v101y2020i2p842-860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Sum of its Parts: How Supreme Court Justices Disparately Shape Attention to Their Opinions

Author

Listed:
  • Ali S. Masood
  • Benjamin J. Kassow

Abstract

Objective While studies frequently examine the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court as an institution, little is known about how individual justices influence attention to their opinions. We investigate whether inherent differences in the majority opinions of individual justices result in certain justices being systematically more influential than their peers. Methods We advance a theory in which Supreme Court adoption of prior opinions is influenced by factors that relate to the identity of the authoring justice. To test these propositions, we explore the universe of the Supreme Court's signed majority opinions from 1986 to 2000. Results We find that intricate tendencies in opinion writing vary systematically by justice in key dimensions relating to their opinions. We also discover that differences among the justices exert an asymmetric impact on citation and adherence to precedent. Conclusion The findings offer important theoretical and normative implications toward a better understanding of the impact of Supreme Court justices on attentiveness to precedent and doctrinal development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali S. Masood & Benjamin J. Kassow, 2020. "The Sum of its Parts: How Supreme Court Justices Disparately Shape Attention to Their Opinions," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(2), pages 842-860, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:842-860
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12775
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12775?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:842-860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.