IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v101y2020i2p514-526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Racial Classification Is Meaningless”: Why Racial Classification in South Africa Is Unintelligible for Some Eritrean Refugees

Author

Listed:
  • Amanuel Isak Tewolde

Abstract

Objective The article's objective is to explore how Eritrean refugees self‐identified in the face of racial classification in South Africa. Methods A qualitative approach and one‐on‐one interviews were conducted with participants. Results As part of a larger study that resulted in diverse themes, this article discusses Eritrean refugees who interpreted the South African racial classification system as meaningless. Conclusion The rejection of the host country's racial classification scheme emerged among some first‐generation Eritrean refugees who did not have racial self‐awareness in Eritrea and who were strongly embedded in their ethnic communities and enclaves in urban South Africa, isolated from the host community. Furthermore, some refugees' rejection of the racial system in South Africa reinforces some South African nationals' call for the dismantling of the apartheid‐inherited classification.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanuel Isak Tewolde, 2020. "“Racial Classification Is Meaningless”: Why Racial Classification in South Africa Is Unintelligible for Some Eritrean Refugees," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(2), pages 514-526, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:514-526
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12783
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12783?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:2:p:514-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.