IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v101y2020i1p376-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

School Sector and Climate: An Analysis of K–12 Safety Policies and School Climates in Indiana

Author

Listed:
  • Corey A. DeAngelis
  • Martin F. Lueken

Abstract

Objective We evaluate differences in school‐safety‐related practices and problems between school sectors (private, public charter, and traditional public) in Indiana in 2018. Methods Using survey data collected from 618 school leaders in the state, we empirically examine the relationship between school sector and the reported presence of school‐safety‐related practices and problems occurring at school. Subgroup analyses based on voucher program participation status, school level, and location are also performed. Results After controlling for factors such as school type, enrollment, number of students eligible for the federal free and reduced‐price lunch, the number of minority students and teachers, and urbanicity, we find evidence to suggest that private and charter schools tend to report fewer discipline problems while employing fewer disciplinary practices than traditional public schools. Conclusion Our descriptive results suggest that school sector may play a role in producing positive school environments. Further research is needed to better understand short‐ and long‐run consequences of school safety problems and how school safety and school sector might affect students’ academic and life trajectories.

Suggested Citation

  • Corey A. DeAngelis & Martin F. Lueken, 2020. "School Sector and Climate: An Analysis of K–12 Safety Policies and School Climates in Indiana," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(1), pages 376-405, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:1:p:376-405
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12737
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12737?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:1:p:376-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.