IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v101y2020i1p309-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Downturns and Hardline Public Opinion

Author

Listed:
  • Tetsuro Kobayashi
  • Dani Madrid‐Morales
  • Yuki Asaba
  • Atsushi Tago

Abstract

Objective With an aim of extending the scope of group threat theory from within‐country tensions between racial groups to international economic competition, this study specifically examined the impacts of perceived relative economic status of an in‐group country on attitudes about contentious political issues with a rival out‐group country. Methods Two survey experiments were administered, both of which manipulated Japanese participants’ perceptions of the relative economic powers of Japan and South Korea. Results When Japanese perceive that their country's economic power is declining relative to South Korea's economy, they demonstrate more hardline attitudes about territorial and historical issues between the two countries. Conclusion This study demonstrates the applicability of group threat theory to bilateral international relations. It also suggests that public opinion about international conflicts is a function of the long‐term rebalancing of economic power, which cannot be easily influenced by short‐term policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetsuro Kobayashi & Dani Madrid‐Morales & Yuki Asaba & Atsushi Tago, 2020. "Economic Downturns and Hardline Public Opinion," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(1), pages 309-324, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:1:p:309-324
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12719
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12719?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:101:y:2020:i:1:p:309-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.