IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scotjp/v46y1999i2p111-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients, Doctors and Contracts: An Application of Principal‐Agent Theory to the Doctor‐Patient Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Scott
  • Sandra Vick

Abstract

The doctor‐patient relationship has been the main focus of principal‐agent theory in health care. This paper focuses on communication between doctors and patients within the doctor‐patient relationship as a method by which the utility of the principal (patient) can be maximised. Patients’ preferences for various attributes of the doctor‐patient relationship are examined using a discrete choice experiment. Individuals were presented with pairs of hypothetical scenarios describing GP visits that differed depending on the attributes of the doctor‐patient relationship. In the time‐constrained GP consultation, the results show that being able to talk to the doctor is the most important attribute, followed by patients’ understanding of the doctor’s explanations, waiting time for an appointment, and the amount of information transferred to the patient. Quality of information is more important than its quantity. The extent to which patients were involved in decision making had no influence on the choice of visit, although it was important to patients who were relatively young and female. Policies aimed at involving patients in decision making should be targeted at specific groups of patients only. The results have implications for the training of doctors in communication skills as a response to market failure caused by asymmetry of information.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Scott & Sandra Vick, 1999. "Patients, Doctors and Contracts: An Application of Principal‐Agent Theory to the Doctor‐Patient Relationship," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 46(2), pages 111-134, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:46:y:1999:i:2:p:111-134
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9485.00124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9485.00124
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9485.00124?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:46:y:1999:i:2:p:111-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sesssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.