IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scotjp/v44y1997i1p82-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mill’S Affirmation of the Classical Wage Fund Doctrine

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Donoghue

Abstract

Commentaries on Mill's1 recantation have variously and loosely interpreted his retraction within an institutional context (Kurer, 1993), as a tract on policy reform (Schwartz, 1972, esp. pp. 68–69, 90–101; West and Hafer, 1978, 1981), as a calculated political act (Forget, 1992), as part of a scientific research programme (Vint, 1994, esp. pp. 1–7, 212–248), or as broadly revisionist (Hollander, 1968a, 1984, 1985, pp. 262–263, 409–417; Ekelund, 1976, 1985; Ekelund and Kordmeier, 1981; Negishi, 1985a, 1985b). Although these writers differ on many points of detail, they all agree that Mill explicitly and unconditionally abandoned the wage fund doctrine. What is striking here is that the ‘recantation interpretation’ has gone entirely unchallenged by historians of economics. In this paper we challenge received opinion on this point and argue that Mill in fact affirmed the doctrine in his Fortnightly Review article.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Donoghue, 1997. "Mill’S Affirmation of the Classical Wage Fund Doctrine," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 44(1), pages 82-99, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:44:y:1997:i:1:p:82-99
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9485.00046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9485.00046
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9485.00046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark Donoghue, 2000. "Some unpublished correspondence of William Thomas Thornton, 1866-1872," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 321-349.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:44:y:1997:i:1:p:82-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sesssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.