IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scotjp/v35y1988i2p149-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Money Can't Buy Me Love": Paradoxes and Expected Utility Theory: A Clarification

Author

Listed:
  • Kemp, John R

Abstract

It is shown that a utility function can be specified that can account for all the normal patterns of behavior associated with uncertain choice,but which is also more general in that it is capable of accomodating behavior that has previously been viewed as perverse. At the same time, a framework is provided within which more recent approaches towards the analysis of behavior under uncertainty can be better understood, developed, and clarified through highlighting the importance that requires to be attached to psychological, as well as economic, variables for the construction of a general theory of uncertain choice. Copyright 1988 by Scottish Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Kemp, John R, 1988. ""Money Can't Buy Me Love": Paradoxes and Expected Utility Theory: A Clarification," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 35(2), pages 149-161, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:35:y:1988:i:2:p:149-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:35:y:1988:i:2:p:149-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sesssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.