IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rgscpp/v11y2019i4p673-693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European identity and citizens' support for the EU: Testing the utilitarian approach

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Aiello
  • Pierre Maurice Reverberi
  • Cristina Brasili

Abstract

Despite Cohesion Policy representing one‐third of the EU budget, research on the role of EU Cohesion Policy in promoting the European identity is still scarce. Taking stock of a new dataset of citizens' support for and identification with the EU identity at the regional level, we aim to answer to the following questions: what are the determinants of support and identification with EU? Do EU fiscal transfers affect public support for the EU and the European identity? Do citizens' awareness about the Cohesion Policy play a role in it? We find that attitudes towards the EU are driven by individuals' perceptions of the economy in their region and of the effectiveness of EU institutions in solving the regional problems. We don't find evidence of a Cohesion Policy effect, but it provides useful indications for further research. A pesar de que la política de cohesión representa un tercio del presupuesto de la UE, aún sigue siendo escasa la investigación sobre el papel de la política de cohesión de la UE en la promoción de la identidad europea. Este artículo emplea un nuevo conjunto de datos sobre el apoyo y la identificación de los ciudadanos con la identidad de la UE a nivel regional con la intención de responder a las preguntas siguientes: ¿cuáles son los factores determinantes del apoyo y la identificación con la UE? ¿Afectan las transferencias fiscales de la UE al apoyo público a la UE y a la identidad europea? ¿Desempeña un papel en esto la sensibilización de los ciudadanos sobre la política de cohesión? Se encontró que las actitudes hacia la UE están impulsadas por las percepciones individuales sobre la economía de su región y sobre la eficacia de las instituciones de la UE en la resolución de los problemas regionales. No se encontraron pruebas de un efecto de la Política de Cohesión, pero se proporcionan indicaciones útiles para futuras investigaciones. 欧州連合(EU)の予算の3分の1が、結束政策に当てられているにもかかわらず、今なお、この政策のヨーロッパ・アイデンティの促進における役割に関する調査はほとんど行われていない。本稿では、市民のEUのアイデンティに対する支持と帰属意識に関する地域レベルでの新しいデータセットを評価し、EUに対する支持と帰属意識の定義は何か、EUの財政移転はEUとヨーロッパ・アイデンティの公的な支持に影響するか、結束政策に対する市民の意識は役割になっているか、という疑問を解明する。EUに対する意識は、地域経済に対する個人の見解および地域の問題を解決するEU機関の実効性に対する個人の見解に左右されると考えられる。結束政策の効果を示すエビデンスは認められないものの、さらなる研究が有用であることが示唆される。

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Aiello & Pierre Maurice Reverberi & Cristina Brasili, 2019. "European identity and citizens' support for the EU: Testing the utilitarian approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), pages 673-693, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:673-693
    DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12242
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rsp3.12242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Gross, 2022. "Does Anyone Care? Cohesion Policy Issues in Sub‐national Politics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1538-1555, November.
    2. Enrique López‐Bazo, 2022. "The Impact of Cohesion Policy on Regional Differences in Support for the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1219-1236, September.
    3. Nikolas Kouloglou & George N. Georgarakis, 2023. "Public Support for European Integration in Greece and Italy Between 2015 and 2020," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 29-44.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:673-693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1757-7802 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.