IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v9y1990i3p527-538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remobilizing The American Electorate

Author

Listed:
  • CURTIS B. GANS

Abstract

Registration barriers have been under sustained assault since the Ken‐ nedy Administration, yet participation in elections continues to decline. By the 1980s turnout in presidential and congressional elections was below what it was in 1960. The demographic correlates of participation–age, education and roots within the community–have also grown stronger, predicting to an increased turnout. Registration procedures are important and substantial changes in such practices are recommended. Without the reforms of the last generation, it is probable that turnout would have decreased even more substantially. However, the principal barriers to full participation are the quality and content of contemporary American politics. Non‐participation is a threat to democratic government, yet the disintegration of the center in politics, the failure to exercise leadership or to offer relevant candidacies and policy alternatives, the weakening of the political parties, the unresponsiveness of political institutions, the trivialization of politics through the media have all contributed to public cynicism and disinterest. The need is to find new and more responsive alternatives for public involvement in governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Curtis B. Gans, 1990. "Remobilizing The American Electorate," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 9(3), pages 527-538, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:9:y:1990:i:3:p:527-538
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1990.tb01060.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1990.tb01060.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1990.tb01060.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:9:y:1990:i:3:p:527-538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.