IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v4y1984i2p259-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Changing Context Of Academic Science: University‐Industry Relations In Biotechnology And The Public Policy Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth P. Rusclo

Abstract

The issue of university‐industry relations in the field of biotechnology illustrates the changing context of academic science. Research has become an organizational enterprise and no longer can be seen as simply the accumulation of individual efforts. This development complicates the normative context of academic science and in so doing introduces important policy questions, especially regarding interaction between industry and universities. Funding, faculty conflict of Interest, and the ownership of intellectual property resulting from research are policy issues which are analyzed in the context of some of the recent organizational changes in the performance of academic research.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth P. Rusclo, 1984. "The Changing Context Of Academic Science: University‐Industry Relations In Biotechnology And The Public Policy Implications," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 4(2), pages 259-276, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:4:y:1984:i:2:p:259-276
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00211.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00211.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00211.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boardman, P. Craig, 2009. "Government centrality to university-industry interactions: University research centers and the industry involvement of academic researchers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1505-1516, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:4:y:1984:i:2:p:259-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.