IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v36y2019i5p660-682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University–Industry Linkage Framework to Identify Opportunity Areas

Author

Listed:
  • David Güemes‐Castorena
  • Idalia E. Ponce‐Jaramillo

Abstract

Although there are many studies of the collaboration between academia and industry in developed countries explaining the phenomenon and prescribing best practices, the findings cannot be extrapolated to developing countries. This article fills the gap by studying these interactions for the case of Mexico. To study these interactions, we performed a state‐of‐the‐art matrix analysis to obtain internal, structural, and environmental factors from literature. Then, an interpretative structural framework was built as a model to identify opportunities in the collaboration process. The results are presented in a map that describes how each element influences the others and highlights opportunities for improvement. The model shows that industry triggers collaboration and presents a highly complex internal organization for the academy. This study helps decision makers in government, the academy, and industry to understand the elements and how the system works to develop strategies that promote more effective collaboration. 用于识别机会领域的大学‐行业联系框架 尽管许多学术研究聚焦于发达国家学术界和行业之间的协作,以解释该现象和定义最佳实践,但这样的研究发现不能类推到发展中国家。本文以墨西哥为例,研究了学术界和行业之间的相互影响,以填补该研究空白。为研究此相互影响,笔者采用最先进的矩阵分析,以获取文献中的内部因素、结构因素和环境因素。然后,笔者提出一项诠释性结构框架模型,识别协作过程中的机遇。研究结果以映射的形式呈现,描述了每个因素如何相互影响,同时强调了提高机遇。模型显示,行业会触发协作,并为学术界提供一个高度复杂的内部组织。本文有助于政府决策者、学术界和行业理解不同因素,和该体系如何运作以发展出促进更有效协作的策略。 Marco de vinculación entre la universidad y la industria para identificar áreas de oportunidad Aunque hay muchos estudios sobre la colaboración entre el mundo académico y la industria en países desarrollados que explican el fenómeno y prescriben las mejores prácticas, los resultados no pueden extrapolarse a los países en desarrollo. Este artículo llena el vacío al estudiar estas interacciones para el caso de México. Para estudiar estas interacciones, realizamos un análisis matricial de vanguardia para obtener factores internos, estructurales y ambientales de la literatura. Luego, se construyó un marco estructural interpretativo como modelo para identificar oportunidades en el proceso de colaboración. Los resultados se presentan en un mapa que describe cómo cada elemento influye en los demás y destaca las oportunidades de mejora. El modelo muestra que la industria activa la colaboración y presenta una organización interna altamente compleja para la academia. Este estudio ayuda a los que toman decisiones en el gobierno, la academia y la industria a comprender los elementos y funcionamiento el sistema para desarrollar estrategias que promuevan una colaboración más efectiva.

Suggested Citation

  • David Güemes‐Castorena & Idalia E. Ponce‐Jaramillo, 2019. "University–Industry Linkage Framework to Identify Opportunity Areas," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 36(5), pages 660-682, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:36:y:2019:i:5:p:660-682
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12355
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matilde Reséndiz-Castro & Rosalba Zepeda-Bautista & Ignacio Enrique Peón-Escalante, 2022. "Transdisciplinary Cyber-systemic Design of Instruments to Measure Academic Performance in Middle and Higher Education Systems," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 395-440, June.
    2. de Almeida, Liliane & Augusto de Jesus Pacheco, Diego & Caten, Carla Schwengber ten & Jung, Carlos Fernando, 2021. "A methodology for identifying results and impacts in technological innovation projects," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:36:y:2019:i:5:p:660-682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.