IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v32y2015i6p723-744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contextual Factors Influencing Collaboration Levels and Outcomes in National Forest Stewardship Contracting

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine M. Mattor
  • Antony S. Cheng

Abstract

The number of policies promoting collaborative processes in national forest management has increased considerably over the past decade but do mandates alone increase the levels of collaboration in national forest management? Collaborative governance literature identifies the importance of the situational context for the emergence and performance of collaboration but does not identify the role of specific attributes and processes. This article presents a comparative case-study analysis of factors influencing levels of collaboration in USDA Forest Service stewardship contracting processes. Incorporating concepts from the collaborative governance literature and Institutional Analysis and Development framework we found policy and administrative guidance alone will not increase the use of collaborative processes associated with stewardship contracts. A combination of existing agency-community planning efforts, leadership, and agency support were essential for collaboration to materialize. Top-down policy direction meant to increase the use of collaboration to achieve natural resource management objectives must incorporate opportunities to establish these conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine M. Mattor & Antony S. Cheng, 2015. "Contextual Factors Influencing Collaboration Levels and Outcomes in National Forest Stewardship Contracting," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 32(6), pages 723-744, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:32:y:2015:i:6:p:723-744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ropr.12151
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ismail Badraoui & Youssef Boulaksil & Tarik Saikouk & G.A.J. van der Vorst, 2021. "The influence of the institutional context on interfirm relationships: A Comparative study between low- and high-income countries," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(2), pages 802-815.
    2. Mancheva, Irina, 2018. "Which factors spur forest owners' collaboration over forest waters?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 54-63.
    3. Anthony Kirubi Mwangi & J. Oluoch Oluoch & Willy Muturi & Memba Florence, 2017. "Effect of Audit Committee Diversity on Quality of Financial Reporting in Non-Commercial State Corporations in Kenya," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(6), pages 288-302, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:32:y:2015:i:6:p:723-744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.