IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v2y1983i3p516-526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Doctrine Of Strict Liability: An Alternative Approach To Consumer Protection Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory M. Gazda
  • M. Jeffery Kallis

Abstract

Using a legal system of strict liability allowing contributory negligence as a valid defense provides an alternative to consumer protection regulation. In addition, the strict liability system allows rapid and responsive compensation to injured individuals. Corporate uncertainty as to future costs and business environment are substantially reduced, thus allowing firms to make accurate and rational long‐term, strategic plans. This paper presents the basic functional constructs required for developing a viable regulatory framework using strict liability and then looks at an example where it could be employed. The scenario deals with an environmental pollution and protection problem. In the example, a strict liability system allowing for a defense of contributory negligence is shown to be conceptually more efficient and desirable than the existing regulatory system and negligence liability procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory M. Gazda & M. Jeffery Kallis, 1983. "The Doctrine Of Strict Liability: An Alternative Approach To Consumer Protection Regulation," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 2(3), pages 516-526, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:2:y:1983:i:3:p:516-526
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1983.tb00737.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1983.tb00737.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1983.tb00737.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:2:y:1983:i:3:p:516-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.