IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v2y1982i2p279-292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential Program Impact As A Function Of Target Need: Or Why Some Good Policies Often Seem To Fail

Author

Listed:
  • Richard I. Hofferbert

Abstract

A growing body of evaluation research has been reporting negative or lack of positive effects from a wide range of social policies and programs. Yet within the data presented one can frequently detect that relative ineffectiveness is far from uniform across time periods and/or population groups. Evidence may be gleaned from existing research to suggest that some policies have differential effectiveness, being most effective where and when the need is greatest, with “need” measured as the change in conditions reasonably assumed to be the policy goal. The essay cautions policy analysts against over‐aggregation of data on policy impact. It also argues that a substantial amount of money and public effort could be saved, without sacrificing net positive effect, by fitting policy efforts to demonstrable need/effectiveness curves.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard I. Hofferbert, 1982. "Differential Program Impact As A Function Of Target Need: Or Why Some Good Policies Often Seem To Fail," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 2(2), pages 279-292, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:2:y:1982:i:2:p:279-292
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1982.tb00674.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1982.tb00674.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1982.tb00674.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:2:y:1982:i:2:p:279-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.