IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v22y2005i6p787-810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voter Disenfranchisement and Policy toward Election Reforms

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Kiehl Friedman

Abstract

How did poverty, race, population density, and other demographic characteristics affect disenfranchisement in the 2004 presidential election? I argue that there are two types of disenfranchisement: partisan disenfranchisement, which targets Democrats, and structural disenfranchisement, which targets members of low‐status groups. Drawing demographic data from the United States census in 2000, and voting data from the secretaries of state websites, I use a negative binomial regression to correlate these variables with the incidence of voter disenfranchisement as collected by the Election Incident Reporting System, for the three “swing” states of Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, with the “safe” states of California and Texas as controls. The results of this analysis indicate that disenfranchisement increases with population density, Black population, Democratic loyalty, and as the margin of victory decreases. Income and education also correlate with an increase in reported incidents of disenfranchisement, but that likely reflects the failings of self‐report data.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Kiehl Friedman, 2005. "Voter Disenfranchisement and Policy toward Election Reforms," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 22(6), pages 787-810, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:22:y:2005:i:6:p:787-810
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00176.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00176.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00176.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:22:y:2005:i:6:p:787-810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.