IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v20y2003i3p459-478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asking Fathers and Employers to Volunteer: A (De)Tour of Reconciliation Policy in Germany?1

Author

Listed:
  • ANDREA VOGT
  • SUSANNE ZWINGEL

Abstract

In Germany, up until recently, the combination of weak antidiscrimination laws and the rationale of family benefits had sustained the male breadwinner–female family caretaker model as the norm in social policy arrangements and gender relations. In the context of the unification of East and West Germany and the change in government to a left‐wing coalition in the late 1990s, the biases of this deeply entrenched model have been significantly put into question. After providing a brief description of the German welfare state context, the article presents the development of reconciliation policies in two parts. First, the measures taken by the Christian Democrat/Liberal governments in the 1980s and 1990s are critically summarized. Second, we examine new steps taken by the Social Democrat/Green governments since 1998 and discuss the possible impact of the new approach on reconciliation policy. In this context, we also consider reconciliation policies at the firm level, an object of recent government attention. The article concludes with some further reflections on a gender‐balanced future between work and family obligations in the German context.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Vogt & Susanne Zwingel, 2003. "Asking Fathers and Employers to Volunteer: A (De)Tour of Reconciliation Policy in Germany?1," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 20(3), pages 459-478, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:20:y:2003:i:3:p:459-478
    DOI: 10.1111/1541-1338.00031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-1338.00031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1541-1338.00031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:20:y:2003:i:3:p:459-478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.