IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v1y1981i1p47-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical Anthropology Health Policy And The State: A Case Study Of Sudan

Author

Listed:
  • Ellen Gruenbaum

Abstract

Medical anthropologists have frequently limited themselves to studying cultural factors in illness, curing or resistance to the acceptance of modern Western medical services. This prevailing “socioculturalist” approach has serious analytical shortcomings resulting from underestimating the importance of the social formations in which cultural factors occur. Consequently, the policy recommendations produced in medical anthropology are often crippled by theoretical limitations. It is argued that the historically specific constellation of social relations governing production and the appropriation and distribution of the economic surplus‐commonly embodied in the functions of the state‐have profound effects on the pattern of health and illness as well as on the availability of health services. In underdeveloped countries an analysis of the role of the state in health is especially important, since the organs of state power play a stronger role in health care than in countries with well developed markets for medical services. In the case of Sudan, the interests of the state in colonial and postindependence periods required a development strategy involving large‐scale irrigated agriculture utilizing seasonal migrant labor. The labor and health policies aimed at economic productivity and political stability are analyzed here in relation to the adverse health effects and serious maldistribution of health services which resulted.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellen Gruenbaum, 1981. "Medical Anthropology Health Policy And The State: A Case Study Of Sudan," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 1(1), pages 47-65, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:1:y:1981:i:1:p:47-65
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1981.tb00377.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1981.tb00377.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1981.tb00377.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:1:y:1981:i:1:p:47-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.