IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v14y1995i1-2p183-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Internal Dynamics of Environmental Organizations: Movement Interest Groups, Communal Advocacy Groups, and the Policy Process

Author

Listed:
  • Martin B. Shaffer

Abstract

How do the diverse qualities that movement organizations bring to the policy process affect the representation of particular interests? This question is explored by analyzing environmental organizations across the national, state, and local levels of the American political system. This article suggests that two types of social movement organizations exist: movement interest groups and communal advocacy groups. While this article does not provide direct evidence of the different policy capabilities of the two types of movement organizations, existing research is drawn upon to consider how each type might fare in the policy process. One approach suggests that centralized organizations with incremental goals are better equipped to attain policy success, while the other stresses the need for active member involvement to engage in “disruptive” politics. To fully assess these divergent views, this article presents a broad review and analysis of the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin B. Shaffer, 1995. "The Internal Dynamics of Environmental Organizations: Movement Interest Groups, Communal Advocacy Groups, and the Policy Process," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 14(1‐2), pages 183-194, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:14:y:1995:i:1-2:p:183-194
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1995.tb00631.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1995.tb00631.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1995.tb00631.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edoardo Mollona & Guglielmo Faldetta, 2022. "Ethics in corporate political action: can lobbying be just?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(4), pages 1245-1276, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:14:y:1995:i:1-2:p:183-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.