IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popdev/v44y2018i4p695-722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception has its Own Reality: Subjective versus Objective Measures of Economic Distress

Author

Listed:
  • Dana A. Glei
  • Noreen Goldman
  • Maxine Weinstein

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana A. Glei & Noreen Goldman & Maxine Weinstein, 2018. "Perception has its Own Reality: Subjective versus Objective Measures of Economic Distress," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 695-722, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:popdev:v:44:y:2018:i:4:p:695-722
    DOI: 10.1111/padr.12183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12183
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/padr.12183?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dana A Glei & Noreen Goldman & Maxine Weinstein, 2019. "A growing socioeconomic divide: Effects of the Great Recession on perceived economic distress in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Vincent Y. S. Oh & Zhaoliang Yu & Eddie M. W. Tong, 2022. "Objective Income But Not Subjective Social Status Predicts Short-Term and Long-Term Cognitive Outcomes: Findings Across Two Large Datasets," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 327-349, July.
    3. Alexa R Yakubovich & Jon Heron & David K Humphreys, 2020. "How do perceived and objective measures of neighbourhood disadvantage vary over time? Results from a prospective-longitudinal study in the UK with implications for longitudinal research on neighbourho," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popdev:v:44:y:2018:i:4:p:695-722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0098-7921 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.