IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v50y2002i4p779-793.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Work Harder? Equality, Social Duty and the Market

Author

Listed:
  • Saladin Meckled‐Garcia

Abstract

The paper responds to Cohen's critical claim that for agents who sincerely accept Rawls's difference principle it is not consistent to seek material incentives towards productivity. The central argument of the paper is that productive agents in a market economy would not be as productive without material incentives unless held to be under a (controversial) duty to increase productivity. This duty is distinct from merely having a duty to contribute up to a reasonable minimum, and then equalise material benefits. The controversial duty is not derivable from the difference principle itself, nor from the background motivations for it. Therefore, if Cohen's critique is internal to Rawlsian distributive justice, it is based on a controversial version of that view of distributive justice when applied to a market system. It is the reach, and not the core insight of Cohen's critique that is attacked here. If in any way sound, that insight does not un‐controversially apply to all material incentive‐seeking in a market economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Saladin Meckled‐Garcia, 2002. "Why Work Harder? Equality, Social Duty and the Market," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 50(4), pages 779-793, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:50:y:2002:i:4:p:779-793
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9248.00007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:50:y:2002:i:4:p:779-793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.