IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/manchs/v88y2020i2p349-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Third Party Complements and Market Entry

Author

Listed:
  • Akihiro Okumura

Abstract

This paper considers two types of components, main and peripheral, both indispensable for consumption. There are two first‐party incumbent firms, each producing the two components, and one potential third‐party entrant that would supply only the peripheral one. By using a two‐dimensional Hotelling model, I show that entry takes place if the peripheral component is sufficiently differentiated. Furthermore, entry of the potential entrant does not harm the incumbents. It can even be beneficial when the entrant captures consumers that were not participating in the market, as it generates additional demand for the incumbents. Finally, entry is efficient for society due to a significant increase in the consumer surplus, while the expected profit of the third party does not cover its entry cost for some parameter values. In this case, government intervention to encourage the third party to enter the market may be desirable.

Suggested Citation

  • Akihiro Okumura, 2020. "Third Party Complements and Market Entry," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 88(2), pages 349-372, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:88:y:2020:i:2:p:349-372
    DOI: 10.1111/manc.12279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12279
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/manc.12279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hui‐Ling Chung & Jin‐Li Hu & Yan‐Shu Lin, 2022. "The leverage effect of bundling on monopoly power and product quality," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 90(6), pages 668-688, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:88:y:2020:i:2:p:349-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/semanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.