IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/manchs/v87y2019i5p694-723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Memory and Anticipation of Income: New Empirical Support for an Old Theory of the Utility Function

Author

Listed:
  • John Knight
  • Ramani Gunatilaka

Abstract

The paper contrasts early theories of the utility function (starting with Bentham and elaborated by Jevons) with the modern theory (laid down by Fisher and Samuelson). The former include in the utility function not only the sensation of current events but also the memory of past events and the anticipation of future events, whereas the latter treat current utility as a function only of current consumption and not of consumption at other times. The alternative hypotheses are tested by introducing both past and expected future income into the estimated subjective well‐being function, using an appropriate data set for China. The conditions under which the happiness score is a proxy for utility are analysed. Efforts are made to examine whether the associations between the introduced variables and the happiness score are causal effects. The tests, involving detailed analysis of reference points, both reference times and reference groups, favour the early theories. Implications for the analysis of some aspects of economic behaviour are drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • John Knight & Ramani Gunatilaka, 2019. "Memory and Anticipation of Income: New Empirical Support for an Old Theory of the Utility Function," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 87(5), pages 694-723, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:87:y:2019:i:5:p:694-723
    DOI: 10.1111/manc.12260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12260
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/manc.12260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Knight & Ramani Gunatilaka, 2020. "Income inequality and happiness: perceived or actual, widely or narrowly defined, fair or unfair, self- or community-centred inequality?," Economics Series Working Papers 922, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    2. Knight, John & Gunatilaka, Ramani, 2022. "Income inequality and happiness: Which inequalities matter in China?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:87:y:2019:i:5:p:694-723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/semanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.