It is argued that the use of an aggregate accumulation function in the 'Kalecki-Steindl' approach conceals the problem of overdetermination in that approach. Three possible solutions to overdetermination within the framework of that approach are then shown to pose serious problems. A suggestion is made of a different interpretation of the Kalecki-Steindl results, still along the lines inspired by Kalecki and Steindl. Copyright 1995 by Blackwell Publishers Ltd and The Victoria University of Manchester
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Volume (Year): 63 (1995) Issue (Month): 3 (September) Pages: 297-310 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Did you know? You can import bibliographic info in various formats into you bibliographic tool, or just into your word processor. See under "publisher info" on each abstract page.