IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/labour/v12y1998i3p489-513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking Labour Market Performances and Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Leonello Tronti

Abstract

The recent EU initiatives on employment policy and the “Luxembourg employment strategy” underscore the relevance of benchmarking as an instrument for improving labour market performance and labour policy effectiveness. This paper presents the major results of a research project aimed at exploring the application of benchmarking techniques to convergence between the European labour markets. After synthetically describing the development of benchmarking techniques in the private and the public sectors, the paper addresses the crucial question of defining labour market performance and presents the possibility of creating labour market performance and policy benchmarks through the construction of efficiency frontiers. A second possibility explored is the radar‐chart approach, a presentation technique that allows both for single dimension and overall performance monitoring. The paper then faces the problem of broadening the scope of benchmarking from the identification of benchmarks to the understanding of performance gaps through more comprehensive analytical tools. In this area, useful contributions are provided by the employment systems and the transitional labour markets approaches. The concluding section stresses the role of normative decisions, as well as the possible political challenges implied by a thorough application of benchmarking techniques to labour market convergence.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonello Tronti, 1998. "Benchmarking Labour Market Performances and Policies," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 12(3), pages 489-513, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:labour:v:12:y:1998:i:3:p:489-513
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9914.00077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9914.00077
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9914.00077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christopher J. O'Leary & Alena Nesporova & Alexander Samorodov, 2001. "Manual on Evaluation of Labour Market Policies in Transition Economies," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number cjo2001, November.
    2. Gebel, Michael, 2006. "Monitoring und Benchmarking bei arbeitsmarktpolitischen Maßnahmen," ZEW Dokumentationen 06-01, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. Ioannou, Demosthenes & Ferdinandusse, Marien & Lo Duca, Marco & Coussens, Wouter, 2008. "Benchmarking the Lisbon Strategy," Occasional Paper Series 85, European Central Bank.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:labour:v:12:y:1998:i:3:p:489-513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrotit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.