IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/kyklos/v39y1986i3p419-442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Efficient Use of Mathematics in Economics: Some Theory, Facts and Results of an Opinion Survey

Author

Listed:
  • HERBERT G. GRUBEL
  • LAWRENCE A. BOLAND

Abstract

We consider mathematics to be an input into the production of human and knowledge capital in economics. The competitive and the interest group models are analyzed as to their predictions about the efficient use of this input. Many stylized facts are found to be consistent with the interest group model and the implication of an excess use of mathematics. Mathematics in journal articles is shown to have grown significantly during the postwar years. In a survey, 250 economists express the view that there is too much mathematics in professional journals. Only a minority of respondents rejects the view that interest group behaviour is taking place. Wir betrachten die Mathematik als einen Produktionsfaktor zur Erzeugung von ökonomischem human capital und Wissen. Das Wettbewerbsmodell und das Modell der Interessengruppen werden auf ihre Aussagen bezüglich des effizienten Gebrauchs des Inputs ≪Mathematik≫ analysiert. Es zeigt sich, dass viele Tatsachen mit dem Modell der Interessengruppen konsistent sind und auf einen zu häufigen Gebrauch der Mathematik hinweisen. Der Gebrauch von Mathematik hat in wissenschaftlichen Artikeln während der Kriegsjahre signifikant zugenommen. In einer Umfrage äussern die rund 250 antwortenden ökonomen die Meinung, dass in den Zeitschriften zu viel Mathematik Verwendung findet. Nur eine Minderheit verwirft die Ansicht, dass Interessengruppenverhalten stattfindet. Nous considerons les mathématiques comme un facteur de production du capital humain et du capital de connaissances en sciences économiques. Pour mesurer l'efficacité de ce facteur nous avons utilisé les modèles de la concurrence et des groupes d'intérȩt. Bien des faits viennent corroborer la pertinence du modele des groupes d'intérȩt et, comme conséquence, le recours excessif aux mathématiques. On voit ainsi que, dans la période de l'après‐guerre, les mathématiques ont occupé une place croissante dans les revues scientifiques. Dans une enquete, 250 économistes disent que les mathématiques tiennent une trop grande place dans leurs revues professionnelles. Et seule une minorité d'entre eux rejette la capacité explicative du modèle des groupes d'intérȩt.

Suggested Citation

  • Herbert G. Grubel & Lawrence A. Boland, 1986. "On the Efficient Use of Mathematics in Economics: Some Theory, Facts and Results of an Opinion Survey," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 419-442, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:39:y:1986:i:3:p:419-442
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1986.tb00779.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1986.tb00779.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1986.tb00779.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Espinosa, Miguel & Rondon, Carlos & Romero, Mauricio, 2012. "The use of mathematics in economics and its effect on a scholar's academic career," MPRA Paper 41341, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Daniel Sutter, 2009. "The Market, the Firm, and the Economics Profession," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(5), pages 1041-1061, November.
    3. Eivind Merok & Nils August Andresen, 2007. "Back to the Future – the Marginal Utility of History in Economics," Nordic Journal of Political Economy, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, vol. 33, pages 1-3.
    4. Philip R. P. Coelho & James E. McClure, 2008. "The Market for Lemmas: Evidence That Complex Models Rarely Operate in Our World," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 5(1), pages 78-90, January.
    5. Daniel B. Klein & Pedro Romero, 2007. "Model Building versus Theorizing: The Paucity of Theory in the _Journal of Economic Theory_," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 4(2), pages 241-271, May.
    6. Turan Yay & Huseyin Tastan, 2010. "Invisible Hand in the Process of Making Economics or on the Method and Scope of Economics," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 57(1), pages 61-83, March.
    7. João Ricardo Faria, 2001. "Rent Seeking in Academia: The Consultancy Disease," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 45(2), pages 69-74, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:39:y:1986:i:3:p:419-442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.