IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/kyklos/v38y1985i4p599-616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interdisciplinary Research Between Economists and Physical Scientists: Retrospect and Prospect

Author

Listed:
  • MALTE FABER
  • JOHN L.R. PROOPS*

Abstract

SUMMARY There have been many instances of the use of physical analogy in economics; more recently the effect of physical limits on economic activity has become an important issue, especially with respect to energy use and to environmental pollution. Further progress in the economic understanding of such questions requires that concepts from physical science, and in particular from thermodynamics, be explicitly included in the analysis. An important step towards solving these problems is to unify the treatment of environmental effects and resource depletion on a biophysical basis, while explicitly recognizing the time‐irreversible nature of the production process. This task is amenable to analysis with (thermodynamic) entropy. ‐ Further, historical experience suggests that such physical constraints ware often alleviated by technical progress which in turn induces a corresponding social transformation. Interdisciplinary work is therefore necessary, however it faces several institutional and professional difficulties, for which some tentative solutions are suggested. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG Ökonomen haben in der Vergangenheit oft physikalische Analogien verwendet. In den letzten Jahren sind auch die physikalischen Grenzen wirtschaftlichen Handelns ein wichtiges Thema geworden. Dies betrifft besonders den Energieverbrauch und die Wirkung der Umweltverschmutzung. Fortschritt im ökonomischen Verständnis soldier Fragen erfordert, dass Konzepte der Naturwissenschaften, insbesondere die der Thermodynamik, in die Analyse einbezogen werden. Ein wichtiger Schritt, diese Probleme zu lösen, besteht in der gemeinsamen Behandlung der Gebiete der Ökonomie der Umwelt und der Rohstoffe auf einer biophysikalischen Grundlage, wobei explizit die zeitlich irreversible Natur des Produktionsprozesses beachtet werden muss. Diese Aufgabe kann mit dem Konzept der (thermodynamischen) Entropie behandelt werden. ‐ Weiter wird durch historische Erfahrung belegt, dass die physikalischen Grenzen häufig durch technischen Fortschritt umgangen und dadurch entsprechende soziale Transformationsprozesse ausgelöst werden. Deshalb ist künftig interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit notwendig, auch wenn dazu mehrere insti‐tutionelle Schwierigkeiten zu überwinden sind. Hierfür werden einige Lösungsvor‐schläge gegeben. RÉSUMÉ Ľutilisation des analogies avec la physique par les économistes a connu plusieurs étapes; ces derniers ans les limites physiques des activités économiques ont pris de ľimportance, notamment la consommation ďenergie et la pollution. Tout progrès vers une solution économique de ces questions demande que ľanalyse englobe les concepts des sciences, surtout ceux de la thermodynamique. Un pas important vers la solution de ces problèmes est ľunification du traitement des effets pour ľenvironnement et la consommation de matières premières sur une base biophysique commune, respectant le caractère irréversible du processus de production. Ce probléme est accessible àľanalyse au moyen de ľentropie (thermodynamique). ‐ En outre, le passé montre que souvent des contraintes physiques sont tournées par le progrès technique et qu'ainsi des processus de transformation sociale sont déclenchés. A ce fin la coopération entre les disciplines est necessaire, mais elle est confrontée à des difficultés institutionnelles et professionelles. Pour leur solution les auteurs propo‐sent quelques moyens.

Suggested Citation

  • Malte Faber & John L.R. Proops*, 1985. "Interdisciplinary Research Between Economists and Physical Scientists: Retrospect and Prospect," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 599-616, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:38:y:1985:i:4:p:599-616
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1985.tb01248.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1985.tb01248.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1985.tb01248.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Broche, Serban & Munteanu, Costea, 2006. "Ethical Mastery of Innovative Technologies," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 3(3), pages 26-38, September.
    2. Malte Faber, 1988. "Der Ursprung der Volkswirtschaftslehre als Bestimmung und Begrenzung ihrer Erkenntnisperspektive," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 124(II), pages 97-121, June.
    3. Faber, Malte & Petersen, Thomas & Frick, Marc & Zahrnt, Dominik, 2018. "MINE – Mapping the Interplay between Nature and Economy. A digital gateway to the foundations of Ecological Economics," Working Papers 0658, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    4. Manstetten, Reiner & Schiller, Johannes & Klauer, Bernd & Steuer, Philipp & Unnerstall, Herwig & Wittmer, Heidi & Hansjürgens, Bernd, 2005. "Evaluation problemorientierter integrativer Umweltforschung - Hintergründe, Probleme und Ansätze," UFZ Discussion Papers 19/2005, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    5. David Bristow & Christopher Kennedy, 2015. "Why Do Cities Grow? Insights from Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics at the Urban and Global Scales," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(2), pages 211-221, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:38:y:1985:i:4:p:599-616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.