IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jrinsu/v85y2018i2p545-575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advantageous Selection, Moral Hazard, And Insurer Sorting On Risk In The U.S. Automobile Insurance Market

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia A. Robinson
  • Frank A. Sloan
  • Lindsey M. Eldred

Abstract

This study quantifies the role of private information in automobile insurance policy choice using data on subjective beliefs, risk preference, reckless driving, the respondent's insurer, and insurance policy characteristics merged with insurer†specific quality ratings distributed by independent organizations. We find a zero correlation between ex post accident risk and insurance coverage, reflecting advantageous selection in policy choice offset by moral hazard. Advantageous selection is partly attributable to insurer sorting on consumer attributes known and used by insurers. Our analysis of insurer sorting reveals that lower†risk drivers on attributes observed by insurers obtain coverage from insurers with higher†quality ratings.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia A. Robinson & Frank A. Sloan & Lindsey M. Eldred, 2018. "Advantageous Selection, Moral Hazard, And Insurer Sorting On Risk In The U.S. Automobile Insurance Market," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 85(2), pages 545-575, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:85:y:2018:i:2:p:545-575
    DOI: 10.1111/jori.12170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12170
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jori.12170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Jędrzychowska, 2022. "A Bridge Life Insurance for Households—Diagnosis and Motives," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Casper H. de Jong, 2021. "Risk classification and the balance of information in insurance; an alternative interpretation of the evidence," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(4), pages 445-461, December.
    3. Jing Jian Xiao & Chunsheng Tao, 2020. "Consumer finance/household finance: the definition and scope," China Finance Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Alois Geyer & Daniela Kremslehner & Alexander Muermann, 2020. "Asymmetric Information in Automobile Insurance: Evidence From Driving Behavior," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 87(4), pages 969-995, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:85:y:2018:i:2:p:545-575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ariaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.