IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jpbect/v20y2018i6p896-913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price and quantity competition in an asymmetric duopoly with licensing

Author

Listed:
  • Shuai Niu

Abstract

By introducing licensing, this study reconsiders the relative dominance of price‐ and quantity‐setting strategies in an asymmetric duopoly. It shows that if the initial cost difference is small or the goods are close substitutes, then both firms will prefer the quantity strategy. Conversely, for the other cases, heterogeneous‐strategy equilibrium will appear, under which the low‐cost firm will choose a price strategy and the high‐cost firm will choose a quantity strategy. With an endogenous mode of market competition, licensing has always proven to be welfare‐improving.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuai Niu, 2018. "Price and quantity competition in an asymmetric duopoly with licensing," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 20(6), pages 896-913, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:20:y:2018:i:6:p:896-913
    DOI: 10.1111/jpet.12332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12332
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jpet.12332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neelanjan Sen & Saumya Kaul & Rajit Biswas, 2021. "Technology licensing under product differentiation," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 219-260, December.
    2. Leonard F. S. Wang & Arijit Mukherjee & Chenhang Zeng, 2020. "Does technology licensing matter for privatization?," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 22(5), pages 1462-1480, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:20:y:2018:i:6:p:896-913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/apettea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.