IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v69y2020i5p1209-1226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the interplay between exposure misclassification and informative cluster size

Author

Listed:
  • Glen McGee
  • Marianthi‐Anna Kioumourtzoglou
  • Marc G. Weisskopf
  • Sebastien Haneuse
  • Brent A. Coull

Abstract

A recent multigenerational study of diethylstilbestrol and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder exhibited signs of both informative cluster size—the outcome was more prevalent in small families—and exposure misclassification—self‐report of familial diethylstilbestrol exposure was substantially mismeasured. Motivated by this, we study the effect of exposure misclassification when cluster size is potentially informative and, in particular, when misclassification is differential by cluster size. We find that: misclassification in an exposure that is related to cluster size induces informativeness when cluster size would otherwise be non‐informative; and misclassification that is differential by informative cluster size may attenuate, inflate or possibly reverse the sign of estimates. To mitigate these issues, we propose an observed likelihood correction for joint models of cluster size and outcomes, and an expected estimating equations correction. We evaluate these approaches in simulations and in application to the motivating data from the second Nurses Health Study, NHS II.

Suggested Citation

  • Glen McGee & Marianthi‐Anna Kioumourtzoglou & Marc G. Weisskopf & Sebastien Haneuse & Brent A. Coull, 2020. "On the interplay between exposure misclassification and informative cluster size," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 1209-1226, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:69:y:2020:i:5:p:1209-1226
    DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12430
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssc.12430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John M. Neuhaus & Alastair J. Scott & Christopher J. Wild & Yannan Jiang & Charles E. McCulloch & Ross Boylan, 2014. "Likelihood-based analysis of longitudinal data from outcome-related sampling designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 44-52, March.
    2. Ralitza V. Gueorguieva, 2005. "Comments about Joint Modeling of Cluster Size and Binary and Continuous Subunit-Specific Outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 862-866, September.
    3. Jonathan S. Schildcrout & Shawn P. Garbett & Patrick J. Heagerty, 2013. "Outcome Vector Dependent Sampling with Longitudinal Continuous Response Data: Stratified Sampling Based on Summary Statistics," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 405-416, June.
    4. Hua Liang, 2009. "Generalized partially linear mixed-effects models incorporating mismeasured covariates," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 61(1), pages 27-46, March.
    5. G. Y. Yi & W. Liu & Lang Wu, 2011. "Simultaneous Inference and Bias Analysis for Longitudinal Data with Covariate Measurement Error and Missing Responses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 67-75, March.
    6. Jonathan S. Schildcrout & Paul J. Rathouz, 2010. "Longitudinal Studies of Binary Response Data Following Case–Control and Stratified Case–Control Sampling: Design and Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 365-373, June.
    7. John M. Williamson & Somnath Datta & Glen A. Satten, 2003. "Marginal Analyses of Clustered Data When Cluster Size Is Informative," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 36-42, March.
    8. C. Y. Wang & Yijian Huang & Edward C. Chao & Marjorie K. Jeffcoat, 2008. "Expected Estimating Equations for Missing Data, Measurement Error, and Misclassification, with Application to Longitudinal Nonignorable Missing Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 85-95, March.
    9. C.‐Y. Wang & Margaret Sullivan Pepe, 2000. "Expected estimating equations to accommodate covariate measurement error," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(3), pages 509-524.
    10. Xihong Lin & Raymond J. Carroll, 1999. "SIMEX Variance Component Tests in Generalized Linear Mixed Measurement Error Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 613-619, June.
    11. Grace Y. Yi & Yanyuan Ma & Raymond J. Carroll, 2012. "A functional generalized method of moments approach for longitudinal studies with missing responses and covariate measurement error," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 99(1), pages 151-165.
    12. Shaun R. Seaman & Menelaos Pavlou & Andrew J. Copas, 2014. "Methods for observed-cluster inference when cluster size is informative: A review and clarifications," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 449-456, June.
    13. E. Benhin & J. N. K. Rao & A. J. Scott, 2005. "Mean estimating equation approach to analysing cluster-correlated data with nonignorable cluster sizes," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(2), pages 435-450, June.
    14. John M. Neuhaus & Charles E. McCulloch, 2011. "Estimation of covariate effects in generalized linear mixed models with informative cluster sizes," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 98(1), pages 147-162.
    15. Glen McGee & Jonathan Schildcrout & Sharon‐Lise Normand & Sebastien Haneuse, 2020. "Outcome‐dependent sampling in cluster‐correlated data settings with application to hospital profiling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(1), pages 379-402, January.
    16. J. Neuhaus, 2002. "The analysis of retrospective family studies," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(1), pages 23-37, March.
    17. David B. Dunson & Zhen Chen & Jean Harry, 2003. "A Bayesian Approach for Joint Modeling of Cluster Size and Subunit-Specific Outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 521-530, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaakko Nevalainen & Somnath Datta & Hannu Oja, 2014. "Inference on the marginal distribution of clustered data with informative cluster size," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 71-92, February.
    2. Shaun R. Seaman & Menelaos Pavlou & Andrew J. Copas, 2014. "Methods for observed-cluster inference when cluster size is informative: A review and clarifications," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 449-456, June.
    3. Glen McGee & Jonathan Schildcrout & Sharon‐Lise Normand & Sebastien Haneuse, 2020. "Outcome‐dependent sampling in cluster‐correlated data settings with application to hospital profiling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(1), pages 379-402, January.
    4. Chun Yin Lee & Kin Yau Wong & Kwok Fai Lam & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, 2023. "A semiparametric joint model for cluster size and subunit‐specific interval‐censored outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2010-2022, September.
    5. Qin, Guoyou & Zhang, Jiajia & Zhu, Zhongyi, 2016. "Simultaneous mean and covariance estimation of partially linear models for longitudinal data with missing responses and covariate measurement error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 24-39.
    6. Sara Sauer & Bethany Hedt‐Gauthier & Claudia Rivera‐Rodriguez & Sebastien Haneuse, 2022. "Small‐sample inference for cluster‐based outcome‐dependent sampling schemes in resource‐limited settings: Investigating low birthweight in Rwanda," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 701-715, June.
    7. John M. Neuhaus & Alastair J. Scott & Christopher J. Wild & Yannan Jiang & Charles E. McCulloch & Ross Boylan, 2014. "Likelihood-based analysis of longitudinal data from outcome-related sampling designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 44-52, March.
    8. Jonathan S. Schildcrout & Shawn P. Garbett & Patrick J. Heagerty, 2013. "Outcome Vector Dependent Sampling with Longitudinal Continuous Response Data: Stratified Sampling Based on Summary Statistics," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 405-416, June.
    9. Firouzeh Noghrehchi & Jakub Stoklosa & Spiridon Penev, 2020. "Multiple imputation and functional methods in the presence of measurement error and missingness in explanatory variables," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 1291-1317, September.
    10. Charles E. McCulloch & John M. Neuhaus & Rebecca L. Olin, 2016. "Biased and unbiased estimation in longitudinal studies with informative visit processes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1315-1324, December.
    11. Xiuyu J. Cong & Guosheng Yin & Yu Shen, 2007. "Marginal Analysis of Correlated Failure Time Data with Informative Cluster Sizes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 663-672, September.
    12. Xiaoyun Li & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay & Stuart Lipsitz & Debajyoti Sinha, 2011. "Likelihood Methods for Binary Responses of Present Components in a Cluster," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 629-635, June.
    13. Ling Lan & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay & Somnath Datta, 2017. "Non-parametric regression in clustered multistate current status data with informative cluster size," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 71(1), pages 31-57, January.
    14. Julie S. Najita & Yi Li & Paul J. Catalano, 2009. "A novel application of a bivariate regression model for binary and continuous outcomes to studies of fetal toxicity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(4), pages 555-573, September.
    15. Faes, Christel & Geys, Helena & Aerts, Marc & Molenberghs, Geert, 2006. "A hierarchical modeling approach for risk assessment in developmental toxicity studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 1848-1861, December.
    16. Chung‐Wei Shen & Yi‐Hau Chen, 2018. "Model selection for semiparametric marginal mean regression accounting for within‐cluster subsampling variability and informative cluster size," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 934-943, September.
    17. Zhen Pang & Anthony Y. C. Kuk, 2007. "Test of Marginal Compatibility and Smoothing Methods for Exchangeable Binary Data with Unequal Cluster Sizes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(1), pages 218-227, March.
    18. Lanjia Lin & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay & Stuart R. Lipsitz & Debajyoti Sinha, 2010. "Association Models for Clustered Data with Binary and Continuous Responses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 287-293, March.
    19. Federico Bugni & Ivan Canay & Azeem Shaikh & Max Tabord-Meehan, 2022. "Inference for Cluster Randomized Experiments with Non-ignorable Cluster Sizes," Papers 2204.08356, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    20. Eugenia Buta & Stephanie S. O’Malley & Ralitza Gueorguieva, 2018. "Bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal data on abstinence, frequency and intensity of drinking in alcoholism trials," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(3), pages 869-888, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:69:y:2020:i:5:p:1209-1226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.