IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v64y2015i1p1-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of forensic DNA mixtures with artefacts

Author

Listed:
  • R. G. Cowell
  • T. Graversen
  • S. L. Lauritzen
  • J. Mortera

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="rssc12071-abs-0001"> DNA is now routinely used in criminal investigations and court cases, although DNA samples taken at crime scenes are of varying quality and therefore present challenging problems for their interpretation. We present a statistical model for the quantitative peak information obtained from an electropherogram of a forensic DNA sample and illustrate its potential use for the analysis of criminal cases. In contrast with most previously used methods, we directly model the peak height information and incorporate important artefacts that are associated with the production of the electropherogram. Our model has a number of unknown parameters, and we show that these can be estimated by the method of maximum likelihood in the presence of multiple unknown individuals contributing to the sample, and their approximate standard errors calculated; the computations exploit a Bayesian network representation of the model. A case example from a UK trial, as reported in the literature, is used to illustrate the efficacy and use of the model, both in finding likelihood ratios to quantify the strength of evidence, and in the deconvolution of mixtures for finding likely profiles of the individuals contributing to the sample. Our model is readily extended to simultaneous analysis of more than one mixture as illustrated in a case example. We show that the combination of evidence from several samples may give an evidential strength which is close to that of a single-source trace and thus modelling of peak height information provides a potentially very efficient mixture analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • R. G. Cowell & T. Graversen & S. L. Lauritzen & J. Mortera, 2015. "Analysis of forensic DNA mixtures with artefacts," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(1), pages 1-48, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:64:y:2015:i:1:p:1-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/rssc.2014.64.issue-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah Riman & Hari Iyer & Peter M Vallone, 2021. "Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-30, September.
    2. Steele Christopher D. & Greenhalgh Matthew & Balding David J., 2016. "Evaluation of low-template DNA profiles using peak heights," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(5), pages 431-445, October.
    3. Peter J. Green & Julia Mortera, 2021. "Inference about complex relationships using peak height data from DNA mixtures," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1049-1082, August.
    4. Tvedebrink, Torben & Eriksen, Poul Svante & Morling, Niels, 2015. "The multivariate Dirichlet-multinomial distribution and its application in forensic genetics to adjust for subpopulation effects using the θ-correction," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 24-32.
    5. Sho Manabe & Chie Morimoto & Yuya Hamano & Shuntaro Fujimoto & Keiji Tamaki, 2017. "Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:64:y:2015:i:1:p:1-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.